I was raised Catholic and went to Catholic school until I
started college. Freshman year I dated someone who didn’t believe in climate
change or evolution on the basis of religious beliefs. On top of questions
about how I managed to start dating someone without knowing some of their
religious beliefs, I couldn’t understand how someone could disregard scientific
phenomena just because a preacher or religious organization told him otherwise.
Now, clearly there are people who identify as religious and hold different
views about science. Never the less, it wasn’t until then that I realized there
are elements of this issue in any religion.
More than anything else I started to think about and question how many
concrete teachings of the Catholic Church I believed and whether or not I
viewed Catholicism (and religion in general) as a “good thing.”
What we believe when we are young has largely to do with how
we are raised and what we are told by our parents, teachers, and people we look
up to. Are we religious? Do we think rationally? How do we understand something
to be true? Do we believe science? What do we consider science? What we are taught
when we grow up, how we are taught to view what we are told, and authority we
trust largely influences what we come to know as true. Our thought process and
why we believe what we believe has context based on how we are raised.
As I continued to read Descartes after our first discussion
in class, I had more of an understanding of the importance of the reoccurring assurance
that there is a god and his writing as “science.” When taken in the context of
the time, it makes more sense. Today, this might confuse us or make us laugh. Science
advances. We are able to repeat, edit, and improve past experiments and
theories. Politics change. Societal values, powerful institutions, governing
policies, etc. change as societies advance.
Thinking about religion, science, and politics together has helped
me identify concrete things that I believe about this world and how, I believe,
religion can’t always support these beliefs on the basis of tradition and the
political nature of religious systems. Since I left Catholic school, I have
come to view religion as being political, hypocritical, and divisive. :( Ironically,
these were not my views while in Catholic school and the teachers I had when I
was younger have greatly influenced the values I hold today. I do want to end by saying that I believe there is value for
a person to learn to have faith, be a part of a strong community, form good
morals, and form some kind of personal spirituality. These were all things that
I was given by religion and will continue to influence me. Being able to identify beliefs I hold has made me more passionate and excited to continue to learn, share, appreciate, discuss with others, and give back as a person- even if it isn't through religion.
I've always respected people such as yourself who don't let religion create any kind of doubt about the legitimacy of science. I am not religious; however, I don't believe that anyone should have to *choose* between religion and science. On one hand, having faith in a higher power is simply a part of human nature; something we can't really control. Trusting in scientific research is and should be a completely unrelated aspect of human thought process, but many let themselves be far too influenced by religions that push their agenda as the only agenda. It is unfortunate that so many people feel the need to choose, when it should be easy enough to simply accept both the possibility of God and the factual basis of science
ReplyDelete