I grew up in a small town of approximately 900 people. We
had the only grocery store, post office, school, weekly paper, and gas station
in the county, so we were considered the “big” town in the area. The grocery
store stocked only the basic essentials such as milk, bread, and eggs. However,
there was an approximately 10 ft space on one wall reserved for tobacco (both
smokeless and cigarette) products.
It has always been a mystery to me as to why anyone would
use tobacco products as they are expensive and scientifically proven to have
negative health effects. Scientific data clearly states that smokeless tobacco can
lead to nicotine addiction; cause cancer of the mouth, esophagus, and pancreas;
cause diseases within the mouth such as tooth loss and gum decay; increase risk
for early delivery and stillbirth in expecting mothers; cause nicotine poisoning
in children; and increase risk of heart disease (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/smokeless/health_effects/index.htm).
Despite the obvious and seemingly well known effects of tobacco products, 3.4%
of American adults aged 18 years or older routinely use smokeless tobacco (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/smokeless/use_us/index.htm)
and 15.1% smoke cigarettes (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm).
The answer to my question of why would anyone start using tobacco becomes clear
when we look at candy options available as I was growing up.


“Big League Chew” and “Kings Candy” are bubble gum brands designed
to mimic smokeless and cigarette, respectively. The products are targeted at
elementary school aged children and up. “Big League Chew” developers said they
were inspired by major league baseball players, who are commonly known to use
chewing tobacco. “Big League Chew” and other candy products designed to mimic
tobacco and other drugs are a morally corrupt way to encourage kids to think
that tobacco and or drug products are safe and “cool”. My favorite baseball
player does it, why can’t I? They made a candy like it, what could be so bad?
These candies indicate the push back that pop culture has
had against the raw data about tobacco usage. The geek with the glasses says it
is a bad thing, but my all-American baseball hero uses it. If you were a kid,
who would you want to believe/use as a role model. We always hear about peer
pressure in regards to substance (drugs, alcohol, tobacco, etc.) abuse in kids,
but rarely do we consider the pressure from the media and even our candy
choices. This pressure or propaganda from media and other pop culture sources
creates a separation in the mind of the knowledge that tobacco is an unhealthy
choice and makes tobacco seem harmless. It may even cause people to believe
scientists are exaggerating. The bottom line is that pop culture and the media have huge sway with public opinion regarding what people think is right or wrong. In order to make an informed choice, we cannot just rely on what a Facebook post says or what our favorite athlete is advocating/using.
Hey Devon,
ReplyDeleteI like how you Incorporated the information based on tobacco and how it is presented in terms of the "Big League Chew". I have seen this at the dollar store and it also made me looked at it as the gum being the "tobacco" that any baseball player would used. I become amazed on how this also makes an early influence to children, although it is candy, as a young age they are exposed to these things, making it seem that it is okay to consume. I do agree with you that we shouldn't always rely on the 'information' that social media or any favorite athlete has, because they may contain things at may be in favor of or against of, just like new reports do.
Given that opening about small-town America, I want to look at the class / culture part of this, too. All addictions (but especially tobacco) have a huge class correlation. So, why?
ReplyDelete